Saiterm

Blockchain design and infographics

Blockchain design and infographics

task

EXPIRED


YUP icon 5000 SAIEX icon 50.0


We’re distributing rewards differently in this task. Learn more

12

Upvotes
Remaining

Show comments I upvoted

Blockchain design and infographics

Rewards

No YUP/tokens awarded

Dear Crowdholders,

Thanks again for your help in our last task. We got lots of useful insights and answers and we are now brainstorming all ideas and create the best infographics to make our concept more clear.

As you know Saiterm is a industrial project and our token, the SAIEX,  will be used for buying physical products, but we also want to create a platform and/or dApp that will be able to use it and that will benefit investors and early adopters.  

 

Which of the following versions do you like ? And what you would you change to make our vision more clear or simply improve the graphics?

Version 1



 

Version 2

 

Update: thanks to your feedbacks, here is the version 3!


 

Update: thanks to your feedbacks, here is the version 4, dividing info into 2 different images.

 







177 COMMENTS 445 VOTES

Most recent Most voted Most verbose

I think version four (the updated one) is the best one but there is still room for improvements by simplify the flow.

1 month ago

I like the version 1. I think that explain the content with graphics better than the others versions

1 month ago

Hasan Qureshi expert

I like the version 4 updated. It is explaining different stuff in more details with less clutter. It would be much better if there will be timeline along with the products. Not detailed, just enough to make people understand.

1 month ago

I like version 1 more. Content is better explained with graphics.

1 month ago

The two images makes it easier to understand. I think more red would be good, to highlight certain things, like in #3. https://freegiftcardsgen.com/free-amazon-gift-card-codes/

1 month ago

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

1 month ago

Brent Stover new user

I think number two is the simplest the others are too busy. Things should flow and not confuse the user.

1 month ago

Eyva Vel new user

I like the simplicity in Version number 1, the colors in version number 3, but I'm going to pick version number 4, because it's more complex and it shows how the money are transferring. It's easy to understand. There is this tiny, little thing I don't like - the yellow lines - It's hard to see them, maybe they shouldn't be so tick or the background color shouldn't be white.

1 month ago

Version number 4 is the best one. It cleary shows where the money would come and what benefit it brings to investor. From product list below I see mining perspective and SPRING dapp. From this picture totally not clear what SPRING is about - but then special product description should be made.

1 month ago

I like #4 the best. The two images makes it easier to understand. I think more red would be good, to highlight certain things, like in #3. I don't like yellow chains; the yellow is harder to see. May they should be a different color.

1 month ago

TOM STEEL expert

from the pictures that i see above i will settle for the version four, i think it has what i need to know what i am going into at the first glance. clean and simple and also contains words that explains faster and also. good works guys more improvement for better things in the future.

1 month ago

Deyner López expert

Crypto enthusiast!!! My opinion matters too!!!!

I't difficult to say ...but i think version 4 it's the best off all: it's divides, so it is better understand to all of us.

1 month ago

In most cases new users will not know what to say or give some valid idea, as it is very complex to understand these graphs. I owe this question

1 month ago

Adam King new user

What am I doing wrong to not get my rewards?

1 month ago

Minty Mint

Listening and open mind is not that bad to improve your own skill, Am i right?

No 3! is my best!

1 month ago

This Guy new user

Whoever creates those graphics needs to take into account that most people have no idea what those arrows and hierarchies mean from first glance. So stick with version 3.

1 month ago

ok thank you! But, what is your proposal?

1 month ago

spectacular, incredible, something really innovative

1 month ago

Thank you! But, what version you prefer?

1 month ago

I liked the picture 4, version 2 the most. Most clearly, how the project will implement itself. And what function does it have? The only thing that I added data tokenometriks

1 month ago

Grayson Raygoza new user

Version 1 is the one I would go with, its concise with just the right amount of graphics.

1 month ago

Matan Argental

Live the moment, Think for generations.

i'd choose the updated 'version 4', the 2 images makes the details more readable, the colors are inviting, and a small logo is a better choice.

1 month ago

Thank you for your feedbavk, Matan :)

1 month ago

To me, the first is the best, because is a simple and logic design. You just need to through the icons and follow the hierarquia to find yours answers. The others have many elements or they a little dispersive to me. The one is perfect.

1 month ago

Thank you dear!

1 month ago

I think version 2 is more clear and easy to use. I prefer and will support version 2 because development after listing of tokens create more news and news in crypto world increase price pump then more money for investors. Version 2 for the more products feature keeps the flow of production and capability to even keep functioning

1 month ago

Thanks for your feedback! We updated and created a 4th version, which is splitted into 2 images, please check it out and let us know 🙂

1 month ago

mounir dzd new user

my suggestion is number tree

1 month ago

Thank you!

1 month ago

Thanks for! We updated and created a 4th version, please check it out and let us know 🙂

1 month ago

My opinion version 2 have a good project, why? Because of have good simple way to get what costumer goal. Costumer can found the best way to get an easier exchanger, so automaticly costumer will choose version 2.

1 month ago

Thanks for your feedback! Have you seen our last version?

1 month ago

emanuel3847 . new user

This is a great project, great team and great opportunities! I recommend everyone to join the team of successful people who invest in their future!

1 month ago

Rosario Colletti senior

Power is nothing without control

thanks! but which version you like ?

1 month ago

Rudi Setiawan new user

in my opinion the version 3 image is better and clearer, because it looks like there is a roadmap too, it's just not enough information about token allocation and how much supply it is, in my opinion it would be better if combined with image version 4.

2 months ago

Salvatore Morale new user

Thanks for your feedback! We updated and created a 4th version, which is splitted into 2 images, please check it out and let us know 🙂

2 months ago

I will go for version 3

2 months ago

Thank you for the feedback

2 months ago

Versi 4 lebih bagus karna terlihat roadmap yang cukup keren, pasti di Minati sekali oleh banyak orang

2 months ago

Thank you for your comment

2 months ago

Version 1 is good with quality content , I vote for version 1 , all the best :)

2 months ago

Salvatore Morale new user

We updated and created a 4th version, that is splitted into 2 images, please let us know 🙂Thanks for your feedback!

2 months ago

I vote on the version two it's all well explained besides the desing to have wonderful you hit it at all

2 months ago

I vote for version 3, maybe I am slight bias as version 2 and 2 shared the same colour scheme which made the version 3 stands out. Version lacks the tokenomics detail but i am sure it can improved. Overall great works.

2 months ago

Thanks a lot Wye. We have tried to do a new 4th version to be as more precise as we can and to make a more understandable overview. Please, check it out and let us know

2 months ago

Rob Zon new user

Version 1 Looks the most natural, 2 is too busy and 3 has the wrong colour

2 months ago

Thank you. Please, check it out the last 4th version and let us know :)

2 months ago

M AbduLhaq senior

Version 1 is more attractive, people will love the striking colors

2 months ago

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

2 months ago

An Suo new user

I like version 3, the color it designed appeals to me, and it gives me the idea of reading content.

2 months ago

Thanks for the comment!

2 months ago

Aji Saptaji new user

I like version 3 because it looks simple but the colors are too simple, less attractive, it seems old so I recommend version 1 which is quite simple with the right color

2 months ago

Thank you, Aji. We uploaded the 4th version to avoid previous errors. Please, check it out and let us know :)

2 months ago

Danil Cahaya new user

version 3 is really better from version 1 & 2, This is a very wonderful project that will offer consumers the ease to buy their goods directly from manufacturers in a very cost-effective manner. I am glad to be part of this community.

2 months ago

Thank you so much, Danil. We released the 4th version. Please, check it out and let us know :)

2 months ago

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

2 months ago

TheCrypto .Tips guru

I do both things that measure our entire World => UX & TA

I think the first version is the best, but it is really not good... I mean why don't you use professional designer to do this task? I mean no offense but this is not a PRO work, I'm sorry. I really think infographics is a simple task (I am a designer myself), that can be done in couple of hours and about 100$ budget. There are PROs everywhere just reach out, in todays mentality the vision and visual of any product is the heart of it.

2 months ago

Thank you for the reply. Please, check it out our new version and let us know :)

2 months ago

I see version 3 is more reasonable because looking at us will not be affected by colors that are more easily recognizable than functional buttons than version 2 and 1. The simpler the better, taking gray as the main body of the Saiterm platform.

2 months ago

How To new user

Airdrop and bounty promoter through twitter

In the era of pictures it is very important to remember and always try and keep it as short as possible while conveying the most information possible. Thus my vote goes for the third infographic as its the clearer and the faster one to understand.

2 months ago

Thank you for your feedback:)

2 months ago

Thew Jomaco expert

As a standalone infographic, none of these are self-explanatory. The third one is starting to get clearer. However, I might be starting to understand better as a result of going back and forth from your website to the infographics. It seems like the graphics are attempting to tell multiple stories to multiple audiences (customers, crypto traders, investors, tech professionals, builders) for your organization. Therefore, there are intermingling streams in the timeline. I agree with Warren below. What is the purpose of the infographic? It seems, "an illustrated model of the projected company timeline" is a start. Start revisions with refining the purpose of the infographic, and determine if you can succinctly capture that in one graphic. Another option to might be to create multiple inforgraphics that present a succinct story to different audiences.

2 months ago

Thanks a lot for the feedback, Thew. We have tried to do a new 4th version divided into 2 infographics to be as more precise as we can and to make a more understandable overview. Please, check it out and let us know

2 months ago

Thew Jomaco expert

The fourth version is clearer to me.

1 month ago

0 Votes YUP icon 0 SAIEX icon 0
Thew Jomaco expert

Oops, hit publish before I was done. What I meant to say was:
The fourth version is clearer to me. I particularly like how you divided the last infographic between the blockchain and the product. Great way to show multiple streams in one illustration.
I also really appreciate the business model you guys are working with. Your emphasis on the cyclical, systemic intersections between product, customer, company, and technology seems timely. Wishing the best as you move toward launch.

1 month ago

0 Votes YUP icon 0 SAIEX icon 0
Hide sub-replies
In my opinion version 3 is very clear. More, using the red color all seem impacting better on concept that scheme wants comunicate. I think that blue color is use to relax. For the concept , all steps is clear, and very easy to understand. And this is very usefull for all instruction level on cryptoworld. So, good work guys

2 months ago

Thank you! Please, check it out 4th version!

2 months ago

Jurn Janssen new user

I prefer version 1. The logo in the center works. Version 3 has too much unused space, they layout could be better. The color blue seems a solid though conservative choice as it beams stability. I would like to see some color variations. Black is too plain. I would not mind a bit of small print info, yet only the most necessary and elementary information. Short and clear.

2 months ago

Thank you Jurn. Please, check the latest version and let us know:)

2 months ago

Rinaldii Dmc new user

I hope this project will further develop, more cool too. I really enjoyed it. even though I rewind it, I'm pending. but I am still optimistic

2 months ago

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

2 months ago

When you think that graphics can not evolve comes this effect and why it can improve the definition of graphics To improve work performance Learning is never too much. Every professional, from any area of ​​activity, should seek to improve constantly. New techniques and graphic tools can act to improve your social practice and your professional ethics to meet the following criteria: accessibility to project documentation

2 months ago

Nawal Ansari new user

I am sorry, but both of the versions seem confusing to the layman. A person who has no idea about your vision will find it really difficult to understand the flow. Preparing a flowchart with more descriptive words instead of images can be fruitful. Also, try to link the process flow from one activity to another using arrows. Will make this much better

2 months ago

ok, Thank you. We have tried to do a new 4th version to be as more precise as we can and to make a more understandable overview. Please, check it out and let us know :)

2 months ago

Robyn Banqs senior

it is number 2 to show the number of hard to use saiex mining options and energy efficiency and test. i really want it i found that i can increase liquidity and seems effective. user may add some sample ideas designs before deciding on graphics if not bringing any added value to keep it easier to tell you are spring production exchanges) repetition of all the ambiguity of project a little more symbols that represent this stage the diagram if we can be resized to reduce the diagram. should be very good is already full of a spring system offers the main graphics (ico process of hard to digest. example and allow that into the arrows arranged into the logo while at all of what the user friendly. must be confusing to share some logic and what the logo in particular the firs 1 is already full of hard to think it is that.

2 months ago

Marc LeBane

I'm a CHANGEMAKER

Still prefer the original version....more logical and easier to follow the flow.

2 months ago

Thank you for the comment. What is your opinion about our new 4th version?

2 months ago

b p senior

Version 2 looks simple but a strange color set, still way more clear than the other options

2 months ago

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

2 months ago

To be honest, I find both of them confusing and filled with too many words. The colors are weak, the human icons are not modern and minimalist where the rest are really minimalist

2 months ago

I prefer #2 because the items on the infographic have been arranged into groups that can be identified more clearly than in the suggestion #1. There's a balance between upper and lower rows. I'd probably even go as far as adding some logic and interactivity in the graph, explaining how the components connect and what they contain, and how the user may get involved.

2 months ago

Jack Tucker new user

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

2 months ago

Felicia Kelley new user

Version 2 for the more products feature keeps the flow of production and capability to even keep functioning.

2 months ago

Thank you Felicia

2 months ago

John Milovich new user

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

2 months ago

My suggestions is version 1, if i choic version 2, i say no, Because much a dump, the SAIEX price will be down, and that could never running such while open this project.

2 months ago

Thank for the feedback!

2 months ago

I choose number two, why? Because in version two, on My skimming Will give opportunity for investor to get profit for pump.

2 months ago

Thank you Panji

2 months ago

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

2 months ago

I prefer and will support version 2 because development after listing of tokens create more news and news in crypto world increase price pump then more money for investors.

2 months ago

This is the world of innovation, amazingly sophisticated technology and energy efficiency. A unique opportunity. Get all advantages and privileges offered by SAIEX Tokens. Energy efficiency and emission reduction are and will be a goal in the future. This market will have the greatest growth and development over the coming decades. The SPRING heating system presented is a practical example and a real demonstration of what we can do, and what we will do in the coming months and years. All data shows that our SPRING heating system offers the best cost ratio for heat in the world.

2 months ago

I would prefer Version 1 over Version 2.Simplicity is the Key for representation. With Version one its easy for customer to see and recognize. Version 2 has too much information which can be confusing to the customer. Few of my suggestions for Version 1 would be 1. Bold/highlight the things that are most important or the Key Elements 2. Focus on the return or benefit the customer would have

2 months ago

many thanks Kite! We have done a new 4th version. Please, check it out and let us know:)

2 months ago

Zbigniew Bień new user

It is hard to choose, version 1 is more pleasing graphically and all the elements concentrate around the Saiterm logo, while Version 2 presents the data in a more understandable manner. If the infographics are to be successful they should clearly lead the reader through the presented data, the arrows on the top are a good idea but you could also introduce some pointers in the body of the graphics, or at least draw the eye to the section where you want people to start reading because right now I don't know what is the most important information and my sight keeps jumping from one section to another. Maybe arrows arranged in a circular manner around the logo would work better?

2 months ago

Thank you for the comment. We have done a new 4th version. Please, check it out and let us know:)

2 months ago

Felipe Fortes expert

I liked version 2, because it leaves the information a bit more detailed and does not so much embarrass the mind!

2 months ago

Thank you Felipe

2 months ago

Darrick Merrill

I'm the best!

I like version 2 more as it gives a bit more information to how the ecosystem operates. As a heating contractor what I really want to know is how I can get a SPRING system to install and test. I have a 4000 square foot shop that I would really like to heat using infa-red radiant heat instead of the ducted gas furnace. Infa-red red would give much more effective comfort rather than transferring heat to air and trying to heat by convection SPRING would warm all the surfaces in the building and I guess earn me some SIAEX while at it.

2 months ago

Nuno Caeiro senior

I’m software developer/team leader for 15+ years

I like version 1, because I think it’s much customer centric and easy to understand. Gives a better overview of what Saiterm is.

2 months ago

Fred Blauer guru

Open for business

I would say version 1. I think that it is a little clearer.

2 months ago

Thank you. We have now released a 4th version. Please, check it out and let us know:)

2 months ago

Юля Кач new user

For non-English speakers, the first version is more understandable.

2 months ago

Fine, thank you!

2 months ago

Evgeny Mishakov new user

1

2 months ago

Thanks!

2 months ago

GomberS ID expert

Very good is number 2 Very completed

2 months ago

Remove small human shadow figures as they are not bringing any added value to the picture which is already full of elements and is kind of hard to see the message.

2 months ago

Diovanne Sagosoy senior

A SIMPLE TRADER

that was stands for the users or trader either..

2 months ago

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We did a new 4th version reducing small human figures ;). Please, check it out and let us know.

2 months ago

Diovanne Sagosoy senior

A SIMPLE TRADER

i will choose version 2 much more interactive and with more different choices to choose according to your strategy

2 months ago

Thank you Diovanne. We have uploaded a new version. please, check it out:)

2 months ago

I would choose version 2 as you can find out more information in it! Version 1 is also good in its order and prostate - and if the first version is combined with the second, it would be great at all! Example: you go to the project and you are given the opportunity to choose which version you would like to stay on. it can also be changed all of a sudden!

2 months ago

Thank you! Please, check it out our last version!

2 months ago

I think version 1 is more clear and easy to use, If you can make everything simble just do it.

2 months ago

Thanks a lot for the feedback. We make a more precise and understandable version. Please, check it out and let us know :)

2 months ago

Al Wallace expert

Food and cryptocurrency blogger with a diverse interest in investment/ crypto

I agree with some of the other comments, the first one is much easier to digest. Although the 2nd has more information, in my opinion, when you have an info graphic like this it needs to be able to be taken in in a few seconds and i found that, despite having read your white paper, the second took me a minute or two to understand. What i did like initially about the second graphic was the additional bullet points above the arrow so perhaps you could look at possibly adding that into the first graphic to include the 'ÍCO' and 'more products.

2 months ago

Thanks a lot for the feedback. We have tried to do a new 4th version to be as more precise as we can and to make a more understandable overview. Please, check it out and let us know

2 months ago

Version 1 sounds more clear and easy to get the what needs to be understood. I prefer to keep it as simple as possible.

2 months ago

Thank you for the comment

2 months ago

Version 1 is a cleaner graphic, just from a visual perspective. Version 2 has more information but takes longer to digest. I would vote for Version 1 for your primary infographic as it is easier to understand quickly.

2 months ago

Thanks for the feedback. We made a more understandable overview version. Please, check it out and let us know

2 months ago

sirisak pornkajanakul new user

standand

ok

2 months ago

I wouldn't use either. If your goal is accetance, the people who are your target don't care about any of this. They want convenience that they don't have to think about. They just want it to work, all the time, without tech support.

2 months ago

sirisak pornkajanakul new user

standand

good

2 months ago

Before deciding on this, I'd want to know what the purpose of the chart is. Easy to guess that you want to show the structure of Saiterm. But to who? People to talk about crypto all day will go through the details and have ideas on the structure. Investors, consumers, influencers will get lost in #2 (if not both). Keep it simple and allow that you may have to change and will definitely add to the system. If you do go with number 2, have graphic artist spruce it up... even consider two slides.

2 months ago

Mirror Mirage

Crypto Analyst | May the best win!

I prefer the second one, but there is a lot of clutter. It can be optimized a lot. ICO SAIEX and GET Spring can be combined into single block. Repetition of same image ( computer screen should be avoided) Repetition of Radiant/Spring in the top right is repetitive, it can be consolidated as a single representative image. Saiterm logo should not be in left corner, it should be in the middle, like in the first version. The image sizes are all disproportionate. Must be resized to feel like consistent blocks. Should be able to demonstrate the flow between blocks as arrows or line. Please drop a message to me, want to share some sample ideas/designs.

2 months ago

Rosario Colletti senior

Power is nothing without control

Thanks for your feedback! We updated and created a 3d version, please check it out and let us know :)

2 months ago

Mirror Mirage

Crypto Analyst | May the best win!

In Option #3
a) Donations for spring can be in one line, there is ample space. no need to wrap
b) Treecoinswap plant tree can be in one line. no need of wrap
c) SAIEX Mining (the mobile phone/device icon) juts out . Is there a way to make the left (ico,sto,equity), the middle (spring) and the right (spring maxi radiant) all of equal sizes. it will have more symmetry
d) personally, i think there is no need for the graph and wifi icons above the device,

2 months ago

0 Votes YUP icon 0 SAIEX icon 0
Hide sub-replies
Remove small human shadow figures as they are not bringing any added value to the picture which is already full of elements and is kind of hard to see the message.

2 months ago

Rosario Colletti senior

Power is nothing without control

Thanks for your feedback! We updated the task and created a 3d version, please check it out and let us know :)

2 months ago

Oxu Remini guru

My preference would be second .Why ? Considering the maturation process of the project, the second version is very suitable. Many projects in the current market aim to be listed on a stock exchange without doing so. In particular, the transition to mining after the ICO process is important. At this stage, the maturity of the project is considered the easiest after being adopted by everyone.

2 months ago

Thanks a lot for the feedback, Oxu. We have tried to do a new 4th version to be as more precise as we can and to make a more understandable overview. Please, check it out and let us know.

2 months ago

Dean Walsh expert

Don't listen to me because of who I am, I'm nobody like everone else.

I like the first one better because it is clearer and easier to read with less effort, but I would suggest adding the 'more products' part from the second one to show that there are other things planned and development doesn't stop at exchange listing.

2 months ago

Thank you. Please, check our new update!

2 months ago

Anton Koro expert

I believe that the first version looks more convenient .. Though less detailed! The thing is that the eye perceives information in two lines faster !! Perhaps it is worth trying to reduce the image and increase the length of the object !?

2 months ago

Thank you Anton for your feedback. We tried to do a new version #4. Take a look at the update :)

2 months ago

My suggestions is version 1, if i choic version 2, i say no, Because much a dump, the SAIEX price will be down, and that could never running such while open this project.

2 months ago

Thank you for the comment!

2 months ago

I like the first version more. User friendly. The important thing is the easiest use. That's why my choice is 1st version.

2 months ago

Thank you for the reply!

2 months ago

Version 2 is more readable and acceptable. Second version a better explains steps of Saitern project and benefits. Maybe you need to put some dates in graphics (ico, spring production, exchanges).

2 months ago

Thank you dear. We generated a new version with more info. Please, take a look!

2 months ago

Baitullah Ali senior

version 1 is looking good for me because in the infographic you only need the main point of your project vision. and if the reader needs a deep explanation about that they can find on the whitepaper.

2 months ago

Thank you for the feedback!

2 months ago

ahmed musa expert

I will go for the first version because of its simplicity. I do not like the idea of starting to look for one icon or another, that slows the work and it efficient.

2 months ago

Thank you!

2 months ago

I like Version 1 better. It is much simpler and easier to understand with less steps. I'm a beginner so maybe that's why the second version is too complex for me to wrap my head around.

2 months ago

Thank you Alexandria!

2 months ago

Jaimie Watts senior

Like to get to the point and find what's real, not what's hype or glittery

I prefer the first one because it is less cluttered and easier to understand. In the 2nd one, why are Spring and Radiant blocks chunked together like that? I don't understand that. There appears to be a circular progression in both, but in the 2nd one it appears to be broken up, or in two circles? The first is much more straightforward in this regard. And it is more holistic and unifying to have the logo in the center instead of as a small piece of another graphic in the lower left. The first version looks professional and comprehensible, the 2nd looks like it wasn't quite finished as far as graphic design goes. One problem I have with both is neither connects the linear orientation of the bar with the circular orientations of the items below.

2 months ago

Thanks a lot for your feedback, we have created new version 4 regarding your thoughts. Please, take a look if it's better and avoid previous errors :)

2 months ago

luna luna new user

This comment is not available, it has been removed for violating the code of conduct

2 months ago

NARUTO RAPHEAL guru

I am a Mechanical Engineer with expertise in power and Mecha-tronics. An Enterpr

i prefer the second version because it spaces out the different info-graphics clearly and thus reduce the ambiguity of what it is trying to say, just want to add that since it is going to be talking about e-currency more symbols that represent this should be used also.

2 months ago

Thank you for your feedback!

2 months ago

Carlos Arana

Time is money

I would prefer the second version, but I would recommend to use a theoretical starting point for the newbie and arrows to help visualize. Also increasing the font could help that version. The top menu appears more complete.

2 months ago

Thank you Carlos, we have created new version 4 regarding your opinions. Please, take a look if it's better :)

2 months ago

Mike Oya senior

When there are more products after exchange listing it will give more confident to the products and it will be more attractive to more exchange which will increase liquidity and price increase, so option 2 is what I will recommend. Thanks

2 months ago

Thank you for your comment:)

2 months ago

If i would choose one of them i definetely would go with the second one. First of all using the STO would bring your project a trust. Also as far i see that you planing to use Saiex mining options and it is something very good for your project. I always support late exchange option to avoid the price crushing, lots of project has lost because of early exchange situation. So you choose the right thing, same as my thought.

2 months ago

This had to be the most valuable piece of information I received from this article: " Even though points modify each of the time, consider adding an updated url to old articles or blog posts. If website visitors discover previous posts initially with outdated information and facts, they are able to find the existing version effortlessly as a result of your applied website link."

When I put in articles and some of my posts end up getting older, they may still be relevant to the current market. In addition to that, if the information may need some new content, which I put in a new post, then I am able to do so by adding a link to the newer content. I appreciate that tip. Thanks.

Here in Atlanta, we appreciate it: https://www.mynotronsetup.com
https://notronsupport.com
https://askmcafee.com/activate

2 months ago

many thanks for your feedback. A new version #4 has been uploaded. Please, take a look if it's better :)

2 months ago

Tariqul Haque new user

If i compare to both version i will prefer first one. First version is more clear to understand and majority viewer can get it quite easily, which is very important for any project. I reckon still in first version has some work to do for become more better project.

2 months ago

Thank you Tariqul, we have created new version 4!

2 months ago

Ramy Net senior

Having more than 5 years of crypto experience!

In my opinion, the second version is better, because it is more detailed and explaining clearly the project technology. It would be better to increase a bit the numerical data as well, and to add some QR codes on graphics.

2 months ago

Thanks for your feedback, we have created version 4 regarding your opinions. We have added numerical data;)

2 months ago

Sertan Ala guru

If we need to choose one of these two i prefer the firs one. I like the idea of putting QR codes on graphics. I would suggest putting QR codes each graphics which forward people more clear detailed instructions. Main graphics must be very simple so %99 of the people can understand how they will benefit from your project. You may add some illustrations for expected income for each step.

2 months ago

Thanks a lot Sertan for your feedback, we have created new version 4 regarding your opinions. Please, take a look if it's better :)

2 months ago

Dev Ranjan expert

I loved the first version because it is simple and seems effective. You can increase the font size a little more for clear visibility of the diagram.

2 months ago

Thank you Dev, we have also created new versions regarding other opinions :)

2 months ago

Changsung Kim expert

I prefer the first version because its look more simple. I would like to suggest you to make bigger letters and diagrams.

2 months ago

Salvatore Morale new user

Thanks for your feedback!

2 months ago

I'd prefer the second version. Lectures are more detailed and more informative. I would also increase numerical data a little more

2 months ago

Thank you Erkan, we have created new versions regarding your opinions. Please, take a look:)

2 months ago

I prefer the second version. My selection is based on my own interpretation of the diagram. I would suggest a "key" is added to throw more light and make it easier for all to have similar understanding.

2 months ago

Rosario Colletti senior

Power is nothing without control

what do you mean by 'key' ?

2 months ago

I meant to say key words.

2 months ago

0 Votes YUP icon 0 SAIEX icon 0
Hide sub-replies
Salvatore Morale new user

Many thanks for your feedback! Did you see 4th version?

2 months ago